Diana and Michael Preston |
Read up, the fact that the book 'Empire of the Moghul : Traitors in the Shadows' was a good read, but what makes it all the more interesting is this Interview.
Not only are the book's questions explained wonderfully, but it gives the book a whole new touch. So, I will not say much, only that there is more to come, Folks...
How is ‘Traitors in the Shadows’
different from the rest?
In many
ways this book is a darker than its forerunners. Let us explain, the focal point is Aurangzeb, the Moghul emperor who now occupies the Peacock Throne. Who better
to rule, he asks himself? His subjects must learn to submit. So must his own
family however close … however dear …
During the
bloody civil war that brought him to power he didn’t hesitate to hunt down and
kill his brothers. It was his duty. If his own children transgress he must
crush them too.
But the
exercise of great power is isolating. Who can he trust? Jahanara, his strong-minded eldest sister who chose to share their
father’s imprisonment but whose love and approval he craves? Roshanara, his middle
sister who has always been his ally but revels in worldliness ...? And what
about his children? He has already imprisoned his eldest son for rebellion, but
what of the others.
Charismatic
Akbar is too susceptible to silvery-tongued flatterers. Taciturn
Muazzam is
outwardly obedient but what is he thinking? Azam is too impatient, too
impulsive. To what further betrayals might those defects not lead?
Enemies are everywhere from the charismatic Maratha leader Shivaji, to
the scheming Persians fermenting trouble on his north-western borders. But
dealing with such enemies, will not disturb him.
He is a fighter … He can see into men’s minds … divine and exploit their
fears and insecurities. There are many more ways to intimidate and subdue a man
than just on the battlefield … He will be the greatest of his line, Aurangzeb tells himself.
But as the long years of his reign pass and he struggles to control his
empire memories begin to haunt him – memories of a father whose love he never
won and of a mother who lies in the Taj Mahal and whose tenderness was beyond
question … of brothers, long-dead at his behest … of hollow-eyed nephews, dying
slowly through opium poison … of his own sons and daughters in sunless prisons. As his life fades he tells
himself that everything he has done was surely necessary … moral even … But how
will his God judge him …?
What kind of research
did you put into writing it?
Reading
as many original sources as we could on Aurangzeb’s life. Like many of his predecessors, he commissioned a
chronicle on his reign - ‘Alamgir-nama’, written by Mohammed Kazim. However,
Aurangzeb ordered him to cease it after ten years of his reign, because he
thought chronicles a form of vanity.
Other
contemporary chronicles include Mufazzal Khan’s ‘Tarikh-i-Mufazzali’
spanning from the beginning of the world to the 10th year of
Aurangzeb’s rule; Rai Bhara Mal’s ‘Lubb al-Tawarikh-i-Hind’, a history of all
India’s rulers by a courtier of Dara Shukoh and others, we detail in the book.
A number of letters written or dictated by Aurangzeb in Persian have survived
and been translated.
Also, in
Aurangzeb’s time several European visitors to the sub-continent recorded their
impressions of the Moghul Empire. They include Niccolao
Manucci, whose ‘Storia do Mogor’ is a colourful, gossipy work and Frenchmen
Francois Bernier who wrote ‘Travels in the Moghul Empire’ and Jean-Baptist
Tavernier who wrote ‘Travels in India’.
Sir William Norris, the British envoy
to the Moghul Empire at the end of the eighteenth century, left a series of
unpublished journals, extracts from which appear in H. Das, ‘The Norris Embassy
to Aurangzeb’.
Among
modern historians, we consulted Abraham Eraly’s
‘The Mughal Throne’, Bamber Gascoigne’s ‘The Great Moghuls’, Waldemar Hansen’s
‘The Peacock Throne’ and the ‘Cambridge History of India’.
You can Read the Book Review here and Buy the Book here.
No comments:
Post a Comment