Lately, I have been reading quite a bit of mythology or what
I call a whole new world of modern mythology. Have noticed quite a few themes
about the authors who have been delving into this world of magic mixed with
science and reality.
We have come a long way from the time that Valmiki and Veda Vyasa
wrote the Ramayan and the Mahabharat. And we would always have the erstwhile C
Rajagopalcharis, Ashok Bankers and the Devdutt Patnaiks of course, equally wondrous
and fascinating, but what makes the newest breed of authors different?
The Shiva Trilogy by Amish Tripathi, Govinda by Krishna Udayasankar, Asura by Anand Neelakantan or
even The Krishna Key by Ashwin Sanghi are all different in their own right. They are adventuring into
a new world of the not so godly gods, in all their avatars, but with a mixture
of fascination and respect, I’m presuming, towards not just the text,
but the entire theories in themselves.
There is all the talk of plots, adventures, action thrillers
and even romance and sexual liaisons, all described with the same dexterity and
ease, which one finds in the modern day novel, which probably has nothing to
do with mythology. In fact, the language used in books by Amish, Neelakantan
and Udayasankar; a mixture of modern terms and the age old words is fascinating.
What is it that makes them absorbing? It was probably the
humour, which Amish writes with, or the anger which Anand Neelakantan shows
towards Rama’s world, or it could be the smooth mannerisms of Krishna, which is put
forward by Udayasankar and Sanghi.
There is a whole new set of opinions, whether it is creative storytelling or
intelligent retelling. Call them what you will, interpretations or imagination
they definitely make good reads.
I was interested to know of the hint of romance between Draupadi - Krishna in Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni’s 'Palace of Illusions' and Govinda - Panchali in Udayasankar's Govinda. Also, the father/ daughter
linkage of Ravana and Sita in Neelakantan’s 'Asura'. Or even the whole concept of
the nuclear weapon and the Brahmastra, in Sanghi’s 'The Krishna Key'.
Of course, we might have heard in passing of these interesting
facets to the story, but in these narratives, these plots are given a little breathing space, actually a whole new room, so as readers, we are allowed bits
of our own imagination to take wing.
3 comments:
I'll pick magic - Jeanie always appealed to me :-)
I completely agree with you, mythology often affords a complexity of narrative and much richer food for thought than the average novel. Especially, although not exclusively the Indian myths.Perhaps because being 'Sruti' in origin and then being often told and changed in the telling, each generation has woven in reflections of their lived social contexts :)
I have to confess though that I prefer some of the more classic retellings. My first introduction to the Mahabharata was through a childrens' version written by Shanta Rameshwar Rao.
I would highly recommend a book called the Book of Yudhisthir, which is a retelling of the Mahabharata with Yudhisthir as the hero. Unfortunately its out of stock on Flipkart. The other fascinating retelling is by Irawati Karve - Yuganta.
http://www.flipkart.com/yuganta-8125032282/p/itmdytjzup7cggrk?pid=9788125032281&ref=327078e0-54b4-430f-a581-743725ebcfa0&srno=s_1&otracker=from-search&query=Yuganta
For more fun derivative fare, have you read Samit Basu's trilogy? The first book is called the Simoqin Prophecies.
Did you know that a Canadian writer wrote a science fiction novel set in India which draws on theses myths? It's called Shiva 3000. Might be fun. Also what did you think of The Great Indian Novel?
Sarin, of course you do :)
Nikhilesh, Thanks so much for adding a few more books to my collection. I can tell you that my grandfather would have been happy, though not for the appropriate reasons!:)
My first intro to the Mahabharat was through the ACKs of course. Still have them though am still looking for last 2 separate comics. Can't seem to find them!
Have not read The Great Indian Novel yet. Will get to it, soon enough.
You don't mean Shruthi or Shruti or even Sruthi, do you? :)
Post a Comment